TWAP vs VWAP

None of the information contained here constitutes an offer (or solicitation of an offer) to buy or sell any currency, product or financial instrument, to make any investment, or to participate in any particular trading strategy.

When it comes to trading, there are many different methods used to determine the average price of a security over a given time period. Two commonly used methods are the Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) and the Volume-Weighted Average Price (VWAP). While both are used to calculate the average price of an asset, they differ in their approach and how they are used by traders.

TWAP

The Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) is a method used to calculate the average price of an asset over a given time period, without taking into account the volume of trades executed during that period. The calculation is based on the time period in question, and is weighted so that each time interval is given an equal weight.

For example, if we wanted to calculate the TWAP of Bitcoin over a period of 5 hours, we would divide the total value of trades executed during that period by 5, to get the average price for each hour. This approach ensures that each hour is given equal importance, regardless of the volume of trades executed during that hour.

TWAP is commonly used by institutional investors or whales, who often have large orders to execute over a given time period. By using TWAP, these investors can execute their orders without causing significant price movements in the market. This is because TWAP takes into account the price movements over the entire time period, rather than just at the time of execution.

Integral SIZE offers a 30-minute TWAP, available on Ethereum and Arbitrum. SIZE’s unique design lets traders execute swaps with no price impact from the 30-minute oracle price.

VWAP

The Volume-Weighted Average Price (VWAP) is a method used to calculate the average price of an asset over a given time period, taking into account the volume of trades executed during that period. The calculation is based on the volume of trades executed at each price level, and is weighted so that prices with higher volumes are given more importance.

For example, if we wanted to calculate the VWAP of Ethereum over a period of 5 hours, we would take the total value of trades executed during that period, and divide it by the total volume of trades executed during that period. This approach ensures that prices with higher volumes are given more importance, as they are likely to have a greater impact on the average price of the security.

VWAP is commonly used by traders who are looking to execute large orders in a single day. By using VWAP, these traders can ensure that they are getting the best possible price for their order, as it takes into account the volume of trades executed at each price level. This approach can help traders avoid executing their orders at unfavorable prices, as it provides a more accurate picture of the market.

What are the Differences Between TWAP and VWAP?

The main difference between TWAP and VWAP is how they take into account the volume of trades executed during a given time period. While TWAP gives equal importance to each time interval, regardless of the volume of trades executed, VWAP gives more importance to prices with higher volumes.

Another key difference between TWAP and VWAP is their application in different trading scenarios. TWAP is commonly used by institutional investors who are looking to execute large orders over a longer time period, while VWAP is commonly used by traders who are looking to execute large orders in a single day.

TWAP and VWAP can also produce different results in volatile markets. In markets with high volatility, TWAP can produce skewed results, as it takes into account the entire time period, rather than just the time of execution. VWAP, on the other hand, can provide a more accurate picture of the market, as it takes into account the volume of trades executed at each price level.

Conclusion

In conclusion, TWAP and VWAP are both methods used to calculate the average price of a security over a given time period. However, they differ in their approach and how they are used by traders.

Tags

Integral Insights

Updates

February 1st, 2024

Integral Insights: January ‘24

Our initial launch with the ETH-RPL pool was a success, quickly elevating us to the second most utilized liquidity pool for this pair’s trading.

Research

January 17th, 2024

Is Liquidity Fragmentation Really That Bad?

When the token evolves into a store of value, it attracts outside traders, focusing on trading costs and slippage. This is when concentrated liquidity truly shines.

Updates

January 2nd, 2024

2023 Review

At Integral, our focus remains on developing a sustainable product for on-chain trading, serving both traders and liquidity providers.

Updates

December 12th, 2023

Integral Now Rewards Liquidity Providers with Trading Fees on Ethereum Mainnet

This enhancement enables liquidity providers (LPs) to directly receive a portion or all trading fees from Integral pools.

Updates

December 6th, 2023

Integral Insights: November ‘23

During November, Integral processed an average of approximately 6 million in volume with around 1.5 million in TVL. The system’s overall capital utilization sits at around 350%. It is the 10th most used DEX on Ethereum.

Updates

November 28th, 2023

Integral Now Rewards Liquidity Providers with Trading Fees

This enhancement enables liquidity providers (LPs) to directly receive a portion or all trading fees from Integral pools.

Research

November 15th, 2023

How Do University Blockchain Societies Gain So Many Votes?

Explore how university blockchain societies like FranklinDAO and Michigan Blockchain have grown into influential players in DAO governance, utilizing delegated votes and strategic partnerships to shape the future of DeFi protocols like Uniswap, Compound, and Aave.

Updates

November 6th, 2023

Integral Insight: October ‘23

We give an update for our work in October and highlight a profitable LP position from a long-term user.

Research

October 26th, 2023

Understanding the Stakes in Lido’s Growing Share of Staked ETH

The community is arguing whether a protocol may have too much control over the Ethereum network. Lido controls a large percentage of staked ETH, which could have consequences for the network’s future security and neutrality.

News

October 14th, 2023

Changes to Staking and Farming

Looking back at our progress so far and to the future with new updates to staking and farming.

Updates

October 11th, 2023

Integral Insight: September ‘23

We give an update for our work in September with utilization going up on higher volume for our new pools.

Research

October 11th, 2023

The Hottest Narratives of the Summer

What were the hottest narratives of the summer? Our DeFi research team delves into the growth of trading bots, RFV traders and more in this overview.

Research

October 2nd, 2023

Uniswap Governance: A Deep Dive

Governance is considered a critical component for the decentralization and community-driven development of DeFi protocols. We take a look at one of the largest goverance ecostystems in DeFi, Uniswap. In this blog post, we'll discuss the landscape of Uniswap's governance, pulling data from empirical research to dissect the system's delegates and proposals, revealing some interesting findings.

Research

September 19th, 2023

What is the DAI Savings Rate (DSR)?

Our research team takes a look at the DAI Savings Rate and its influence on various yield dynamics in DeFi.

Updates

September 15th, 2023

Integral Insight: August ‘23

We give an update for our work in August with cheaper gas fees and the launch of the Integral Relayer on Arbitrum!

Product

September 7th, 2023

Integral Relayer Launches on Arbitrum

We are excited to announce the launch of the Atomic Relayer on Arbitrum. This will bring the efficient and tested system for atomic trades to the Arbitrum Layer 2 network!

Research

August 26th, 2023

How CRV Got Sold OTC

In this post we cover how the Curve founder sold large amounts of CRV in over-the-counter trades in order to prevent a potentially catastrophic liquidation event in DeFi.

News

August 18th, 2023

Integral Insight: July '23

Sharing our progress in July: preparations for atomic swaps on Arbitrum, trading SIZE with lower gas fees and more.

Narratives

August 4th, 2023

Can Real Yield Replace Token Incentives for LPs?

DeFi protocols have relied on the distribution of native tokens to incentivize liquidity providers (LPs). In a previous post, we delved into traditional liquidity incentives and the utilization of vote-escrow tokens. Now, we shift our focus to a fresh approach that has captured the attention of DeFi enthusiasts: concentrated liquidity methods.

News

July 29th, 2023

Post-Mortem Report: Precision Error for Actions in Integral SIZE

A potential vulnerability was identified in the Integral protocol via our Immunefi bounty program. We did not observe the exploit active in production and we have since deployed a patch and the system is back to running as normal. No user funds were lost.