How CRV Got Sold OTC

None of the information contained here constitutes an offer (or solicitation of an offer) to buy or sell any currency, product or financial instrument, to make any investment, or to participate in any particular trading strategy.

Over-the-counter (OTC) sales refer to the trading of assets directly between two parties, without the supervision of an exchange. These trades are often preferred when dealing with large volumes of an asset, to avoid significant price slippage and to maintain confidentiality. In the last weeks we’ve seen a prominent example of this kind of trade playing out in real time to prevent a possible catastrophe in DeFi. Here’s the story of the CRV OTC deals.

A Liquidation Approaches

The Curve founder had an enormous position in CRV, hundreds of millions, which were deposited on Aave and other lending protocols. He borrowed stablecoins against this collateral and notably purchased a mansion. Throughout most of the bear market, the debt appeared to be in good standing. However, as circumstances in the DeFi market changed, the debt came close to being tested a few times.

A devastating hack affected CRV, particularly the CRV/ETH pair. This security breach led to funds being stolen from the main liquidity pool where CRV was traded on-chain. As a result of the hack, CRV’s price began to decline. The founder’s position edged dangerously close to liquidation. With minimal CRV liquidity on-chain, liquidations would likely have triggered a catastrophic cascade, pushing the price further down and setting off additional liquidations.

An OTC Solution

With limited stablecoins in his wallet and the liquidation price creeping closer, the Curve founder had to act decisively to protect his position and prevent DeFi-wide consequences. He initiated off-chain, OTC sales of his CRV. The terms, confirmed by multiple buyers, were a handshake agreement to buy CRV at $0.40 and to hold it for at least six months. Initially, only a few buyers were involved, but as news spread, more potential buyers and projects eagerly expressed interest in these large CRV purchases. Ultimately, the founder sold hundreds of millions of CRV, significantly reducing his outstanding debt.

While the exact off-chain negotiations remain a matter of speculation, the method was apparent from on-chain transactions. Buyers sent stablecoins, typically USDT or USDC, to the Curve founder. The founder used these stablecoins to repay his debt on the lending protocols, allowing him to reduce his leverage and withdraw more CRV. The CRV tokens, once withdrawn, were sent to buyers at the agreed price of $0.40.

The largest deals amounted to tens of millions of dollars, with the usage of CRV varying across transactions. Several DAOs purchased CRV to cheaply incentivize their liquidity pools with gauge votes. Some market makers acquired CRV to maintain inventory for market-making on exchanges. A number of individuals, bullish on the Curve ecosystem, sought this opportunity for cheap and sizable exposure to CRV.

What Next For OTC in DeFi?

In the end, disaster was averted. No lending protocol absorbed bad debt, and all have since made adjustments to minimize exposure to CRV and the potential for a future liquidation cascade. New, incentivized CRV liquidity pools have been established, adding depth to CRV trades. While this saga led to a broader decentralization of CRV ownership, it highlights the pivotal role that bespoke deals can play in the new financial landscape of DeFi.

It also shows that there are DeFi primitives that are still waiting to be built. All of the OTC deals were negotiated off-chain and done on a handshake basis. While this time it worked, in other situations the reputation or willingness of market participants to trade on good faith may not be there. There are few OTC solutions that would have served this particular incident, which suggests that there are further areas in DeFi still to explore.

Tags

Integral Insights

Updates

February 1st, 2024

Integral Insights: January ‘24

Our initial launch with the ETH-RPL pool was a success, quickly elevating us to the second most utilized liquidity pool for this pair’s trading.

Research

January 17th, 2024

Is Liquidity Fragmentation Really That Bad?

When the token evolves into a store of value, it attracts outside traders, focusing on trading costs and slippage. This is when concentrated liquidity truly shines.

Updates

January 2nd, 2024

2023 Review

At Integral, our focus remains on developing a sustainable product for on-chain trading, serving both traders and liquidity providers.

Updates

December 12th, 2023

Integral Now Rewards Liquidity Providers with Trading Fees on Ethereum Mainnet

This enhancement enables liquidity providers (LPs) to directly receive a portion or all trading fees from Integral pools.

Updates

December 6th, 2023

Integral Insights: November ‘23

During November, Integral processed an average of approximately 6 million in volume with around 1.5 million in TVL. The system’s overall capital utilization sits at around 350%. It is the 10th most used DEX on Ethereum.

Updates

November 28th, 2023

Integral Now Rewards Liquidity Providers with Trading Fees

This enhancement enables liquidity providers (LPs) to directly receive a portion or all trading fees from Integral pools.

Research

November 15th, 2023

How Do University Blockchain Societies Gain So Many Votes?

Explore how university blockchain societies like FranklinDAO and Michigan Blockchain have grown into influential players in DAO governance, utilizing delegated votes and strategic partnerships to shape the future of DeFi protocols like Uniswap, Compound, and Aave.

Updates

November 6th, 2023

Integral Insight: October ‘23

We give an update for our work in October and highlight a profitable LP position from a long-term user.

Research

October 26th, 2023

Understanding the Stakes in Lido’s Growing Share of Staked ETH

The community is arguing whether a protocol may have too much control over the Ethereum network. Lido controls a large percentage of staked ETH, which could have consequences for the network’s future security and neutrality.

News

October 14th, 2023

Changes to Staking and Farming

Looking back at our progress so far and to the future with new updates to staking and farming.

Updates

October 11th, 2023

Integral Insight: September ‘23

We give an update for our work in September with utilization going up on higher volume for our new pools.

Research

October 11th, 2023

The Hottest Narratives of the Summer

What were the hottest narratives of the summer? Our DeFi research team delves into the growth of trading bots, RFV traders and more in this overview.

Research

October 2nd, 2023

Uniswap Governance: A Deep Dive

Governance is considered a critical component for the decentralization and community-driven development of DeFi protocols. We take a look at one of the largest goverance ecostystems in DeFi, Uniswap. In this blog post, we'll discuss the landscape of Uniswap's governance, pulling data from empirical research to dissect the system's delegates and proposals, revealing some interesting findings.

Research

September 19th, 2023

What is the DAI Savings Rate (DSR)?

Our research team takes a look at the DAI Savings Rate and its influence on various yield dynamics in DeFi.

Updates

September 15th, 2023

Integral Insight: August ‘23

We give an update for our work in August with cheaper gas fees and the launch of the Integral Relayer on Arbitrum!

Product

September 7th, 2023

Integral Relayer Launches on Arbitrum

We are excited to announce the launch of the Atomic Relayer on Arbitrum. This will bring the efficient and tested system for atomic trades to the Arbitrum Layer 2 network!

Research

August 26th, 2023

How CRV Got Sold OTC

In this post we cover how the Curve founder sold large amounts of CRV in over-the-counter trades in order to prevent a potentially catastrophic liquidation event in DeFi.

News

August 18th, 2023

Integral Insight: July '23

Sharing our progress in July: preparations for atomic swaps on Arbitrum, trading SIZE with lower gas fees and more.

Narratives

August 4th, 2023

Can Real Yield Replace Token Incentives for LPs?

DeFi protocols have relied on the distribution of native tokens to incentivize liquidity providers (LPs). In a previous post, we delved into traditional liquidity incentives and the utilization of vote-escrow tokens. Now, we shift our focus to a fresh approach that has captured the attention of DeFi enthusiasts: concentrated liquidity methods.

News

July 29th, 2023

Post-Mortem Report: Precision Error for Actions in Integral SIZE

A potential vulnerability was identified in the Integral protocol via our Immunefi bounty program. We did not observe the exploit active in production and we have since deployed a patch and the system is back to running as normal. No user funds were lost.