None of the information contained here constitutes an offer (or solicitation of an offer) to buy or sell any currency, product or financial instrument, to make any investment, or to participate in any particular trading strategy.

The crypto market has been no stranger to its share of upheavals and dramatic events, but the recent USDC depegging has sent shockwaves throughout the nascent financial ecosystem.

The stablecoin, designed to maintain a 1:1 peg with the US dollar, lost its footing as news emerged that Circle, the company behind USDC, had more than $3 billion deposited in the now-shuttered Silicon Valley Bank (SVB). In this post, we’ll explore the events leading up to the depegging, the market’s reaction, and the potential implications for stablecoins and the broader crypto landscape.

The Unraveling of Silicon Valley Bank

The first domino to fall was the sudden closure of SVB by federal regulators on Friday, March 10th. The decision to shut down the bank was a significant development that sent ripples throughout the financial world. SVB was a major player in the tech and startup scene, with a large client base that included not only Circle but also many other high-profile companies.

USDC’s Vulnerability Exposed

As the market began to grasp the implications of SVB’s closure, the link between Circle’s USDC and the now-defunct bank was quickly established. Speculation mounted that USDC might not be fully backed, causing doubts about the stablecoin’s ability to maintain its 1:1 peg with the US dollar. This uncertainty led to a wave of selling in the secondary market, as investors sought to reduce their exposure to USDC.

The Depegging

The mass sell-off in the secondary market ultimately led to USDC losing its peg with the US dollar. The stablecoin, which had been trading at a value consistently close to $1, started to decline in value as investors lost confidence in its backing. This event marked a turning point for the once-reliable stablecoin, as its stability was now in question.

Market Reaction and Impact

The USDC depegging had significant consequences for both the stablecoin and the wider cryptocurrency market. Many investors who had relied on USDC as a safe haven during periods of market volatility were suddenly left exposed. The loss of trust in USDC also led to a broader questioning of other stablecoins and the mechanisms that underpin their stability.

Assets that were backed or paired with USDC also sold a sell off. Amid the uncertainty, even MakerDAO took emergency governance action to prevent further inflows of USDC to their protocol.

Meanwhile, USDT and other stablecoins without exposure to Circle or USDC rose. LUSD, backed only by ETH, traded at a significant premium.

In addition to the market impact on USDC, the depegging also had a ripple effect on other assets in the cryptocurrency market. Assets that were backed or paired with USDC, such as liquidity pools, also saw a sell-off. MakerDAO, the decentralized finance protocol that relies heavily on USDC, took emergency governance action to prevent further inflows to their protocol.

Meanwhile, other stablecoins, such as USDT, which were not exposed to Circle or USDC, saw increased demand. Some investors even turned to more novel stablecoins, such as LUSD, backed only by ETH. LUSD traded at a significant premium during the USDC depegging crisis.

In the larger financial market, crypto has continued to be dogged by regulators. In the aftermath of the USDC depeg and SVB collapse, “crypto-friendly” Signature Bank was also shut down by federal authorities.

Looking Ahead: Lessons and Implications

The USDC depeg raises important questions about the future of stablecoins and the role of regulation in the crypto market. Trust is a critical component in the world of finance, and the events surrounding USDC have highlighted the need for greater transparency and oversight in the stablecoin sector.

With Circle billions processed through the redemption channels, USDC has returned to peg, and lives to fight another day.

While this incident may serve as a wake-up call for both regulators and stablecoin issuers, it also underscores the importance of due diligence by investors and the need to diversify their holdings in the rapidly evolving crypto landscape.