Understanding the Stakes in Lido’s Growing Share of Staked ETH

None of the information contained here constitutes an offer (or solicitation of an offer) to buy or sell any currency, product or financial instrument, to make any investment, or to participate in any particular trading strategy.

With the full power of ETH staking unleashed with the ability to withdraw, staking dynamics have become a focal point of discussion within the Ethereum community. Lido stands as the leading staking platform offering users the ability to stake their Ethereum (ETH) holdings and in return, receive stETH, a liquid staking token. The rise of Lido has been attributed to the ease of staking and liquidity stETH provides, allowing it for a large set of users in DeFi. The result is that Lido has grown to preside over a significant share of all the Ethereum staked.

Lido has captured around 30% of ETH staking share.

This has become a growing source of concern within the larger Ethereum community. The crux of the issue lies in the risks of centralization associated with Lido’s dominance in ETH staking. Lido dominance could potentially stifle competition, hinder the entry of new decentralized staking solutions, and at worst, it could pose a threat to network security.

With regulatory bodies scrutinizing staking platforms, especially those with a large market share, the broader Ethereum and DeFi ecosystem could face repercussions in the event of issues or even willful actions from token holders, because of stETH and its prevalence in the market.

Community and Developer Response

The concerns have not fallen on deaf ears. Several initiatives are underway to address the centralization issue. The Ethereum community has taken up both sides of the issue. Those arguing that Lido is getting too large have explored various solutions:

Self Limiting

In this case, Lido would vote to cap their deposits at a set percentage of total stake. But LDO holders already voted down a previous proposal on this decision, and users have continued to vote with their money by depositing ETH in the protocol. Some people have been acting on this through social consensus, with Lido’s rejection from the first round of Arbitrum grants a signal that some parts of the community are actively working to limit Lido’s further growth.

Better Products

Some builders have taken it upon themselves to release competing products. Whether aiming to be more decentralized like rETH, or with higher yield like sfrxETH, the various other liquid staking protocols have all been vying for staking share in their unique ways.

Protocol Level Limiting

Perhaps a drastic solution, but one that has been discussed, is limiting the share of stake at the protocol level. This would require lots of work and planning for the protocol development teams, but could cut right to the core issues.

Wait and see

There are some voices that suggest the problem isn’t really a problem. Maybe over time the issue will resolve itself as the market matures.

For their part, Lido has been proactive in discussing and working towards solutions. There are already clear plans on the roadmap to address decentralization of both votes and node operators. Lido is also planning to introduce dual voting that will allow stETH holders to have a say and potentially a veto in protocol governance. It remains to be seen if these steps will be sufficient to alleviate the concerns.

Bringing The Community Together

The unfolding narrative around Lido’s dominance in Ethereum staking through stETH is reflective of a larger dialogue concerning decentralization in the blockchain sphere. As Ethereum continues to evolve, so does the discourse around decentralized staking solutions. If some of the critics are right, it could represent an existential threat to the Ethereum network. We trust in the builders and community members who are all working towards better versions of this new technology. The Lido controversy should serve as a catalyst towards creating a more diversified and decentralized staking ecosystem that represents the diverse voices of Ethereum’s community.


Integral Insights


February 1st, 2024

Integral Insights: January ‘24

Our initial launch with the ETH-RPL pool was a success, quickly elevating us to the second most utilized liquidity pool for this pair’s trading.


January 17th, 2024

Is Liquidity Fragmentation Really That Bad?

When the token evolves into a store of value, it attracts outside traders, focusing on trading costs and slippage. This is when concentrated liquidity truly shines.


January 2nd, 2024

2023 Review

At Integral, our focus remains on developing a sustainable product for on-chain trading, serving both traders and liquidity providers.


December 12th, 2023

Integral Now Rewards Liquidity Providers with Trading Fees on Ethereum Mainnet

This enhancement enables liquidity providers (LPs) to directly receive a portion or all trading fees from Integral pools.


December 6th, 2023

Integral Insights: November ‘23

During November, Integral processed an average of approximately 6 million in volume with around 1.5 million in TVL. The system’s overall capital utilization sits at around 350%. It is the 10th most used DEX on Ethereum.


November 28th, 2023

Integral Now Rewards Liquidity Providers with Trading Fees

This enhancement enables liquidity providers (LPs) to directly receive a portion or all trading fees from Integral pools.


November 15th, 2023

How Do University Blockchain Societies Gain So Many Votes?

Explore how university blockchain societies like FranklinDAO and Michigan Blockchain have grown into influential players in DAO governance, utilizing delegated votes and strategic partnerships to shape the future of DeFi protocols like Uniswap, Compound, and Aave.


November 6th, 2023

Integral Insight: October ‘23

We give an update for our work in October and highlight a profitable LP position from a long-term user.


October 26th, 2023

Understanding the Stakes in Lido’s Growing Share of Staked ETH

The community is arguing whether a protocol may have too much control over the Ethereum network. Lido controls a large percentage of staked ETH, which could have consequences for the network’s future security and neutrality.


October 14th, 2023

Changes to Staking and Farming

Looking back at our progress so far and to the future with new updates to staking and farming.


October 11th, 2023

Integral Insight: September ‘23

We give an update for our work in September with utilization going up on higher volume for our new pools.


October 11th, 2023

The Hottest Narratives of the Summer

What were the hottest narratives of the summer? Our DeFi research team delves into the growth of trading bots, RFV traders and more in this overview.


October 2nd, 2023

Uniswap Governance: A Deep Dive

Governance is considered a critical component for the decentralization and community-driven development of DeFi protocols. We take a look at one of the largest goverance ecostystems in DeFi, Uniswap. In this blog post, we'll discuss the landscape of Uniswap's governance, pulling data from empirical research to dissect the system's delegates and proposals, revealing some interesting findings.


September 19th, 2023

What is the DAI Savings Rate (DSR)?

Our research team takes a look at the DAI Savings Rate and its influence on various yield dynamics in DeFi.


September 15th, 2023

Integral Insight: August ‘23

We give an update for our work in August with cheaper gas fees and the launch of the Integral Relayer on Arbitrum!


September 7th, 2023

Integral Relayer Launches on Arbitrum

We are excited to announce the launch of the Atomic Relayer on Arbitrum. This will bring the efficient and tested system for atomic trades to the Arbitrum Layer 2 network!


August 26th, 2023

How CRV Got Sold OTC

In this post we cover how the Curve founder sold large amounts of CRV in over-the-counter trades in order to prevent a potentially catastrophic liquidation event in DeFi.


August 18th, 2023

Integral Insight: July '23

Sharing our progress in July: preparations for atomic swaps on Arbitrum, trading SIZE with lower gas fees and more.


August 4th, 2023

Can Real Yield Replace Token Incentives for LPs?

DeFi protocols have relied on the distribution of native tokens to incentivize liquidity providers (LPs). In a previous post, we delved into traditional liquidity incentives and the utilization of vote-escrow tokens. Now, we shift our focus to a fresh approach that has captured the attention of DeFi enthusiasts: concentrated liquidity methods.


July 29th, 2023

Post-Mortem Report: Precision Error for Actions in Integral SIZE

A potential vulnerability was identified in the Integral protocol via our Immunefi bounty program. We did not observe the exploit active in production and we have since deployed a patch and the system is back to running as normal. No user funds were lost.